Asus G550JK Review

April 2, 2019

The Asus G550JK isn’t as beefy hunting as some of its stable mates while in the Republic of Gamers assortment,and this can make it a a lot more sensible choice if you are a gamer on the lookout for a little something much easier to carry from here to there.The unit includes a 15.6in form element,and while it isn’t going to have space for dual-GPUs and RAID 0 arrays,it does still possess plenty of grunt for operating most video games at an satisfactory degree.We want to feel of this notebook like a little bit of an all-rounder,even though,primarily since it could also be considered by any individual who just needs a highly effective mobile personal computer asus gl702vs charger for perform and play.The Asus ROG G550JK may be compact,slim and portable,however it packs a large punch.And even when operating at highest pace,G550JK keeps its neat thanks to the intelligent dual-fan cooling technique,which uses two independent fans and copper heat-sinks to neat the CPU and GPU completely when essential.Visual enjoyment is assured through the Asus G550JK’s beautifully-detailed 15.6-inch Full HD IPS LED-backlit display,with its broad 178-degree viewing angles and anti-glare coating for comfort during prolonged gaming sessions.ASUS Colour Gamut Management and automatic Colour Management assure a beautiful visual knowledge in any respect times,with correct,deep,rich and lifelike colours.ASUS SonicMaster Premium,incorporating ICEpower,Bang & Olufsen technology,gives the Asus G550JK incredibly highly effective high-fidelity audio with unrivalled clarity,and the external SonicMaster subwoofer pumps out massive bass for truly immersive gaming.ROG AudioWizard software makes light get the job done of controlling audio settings for any environment,with five presets for different game genres.The sleek and muscular low-profile aluminum lines of Asus ROG G550JK are enhanced through the signature ROG shade scheme of matte black with fine red diamond-cut detailing.The subtle illuminated ROG logo on the lid adds a touch of exclusivity and helps make sure opponents know exactly what they’re up against.Just as awesome is the red backlight on the seamless one-piece chiclet keyboard,making it easy on the eyes samsung np355e5c charger when gaming in darkened environments.Measuring just 27 mm at the thickest point,G550JK can go anywhere,and win everywhere.

Design

It might be cheaper than the competition,but the G550JK still looks like a high-class gaming notebook thanks to the attractive black-and-red theme.Glimpses of crimson stand out among the black brushed aluminium,with a bevelled edge around the base,red letters hp envy dv6 adapter on the keyboard and glowing power buttons and logos.Decent dimensions compliment the slick design: a 2.6kg weight and 28mm thickness.Those figures undercut bulky gaming notebooks,but they look almost ordinary when stacked up against the recent influx of svelter systems.The Gigabyte Aorus X7 v2 is four millimetres thinner than the Asus and weighs almost half a kilo far more even though the MSI GS60 2PE Ghost Pro weighs 1.96kg and is just under 20mm thin.Both of those systems suffered with inconsistent sager np9877 charger build quality,but that’s not a criticism we can level at the G550JK.There’s little give across the wrist-rest and the base,and the 6mm-thin screen is sturdy: it flexes back and forward,like any 15.6in panel,but there’s no excessive movement or desktop distortion.We’d nevertheless use a sleeve or case with this machine,but it’s much more able to withstand life on the road than its two flimsier rivals.As with many slimmer machines,interior access suffers.The components are only accessible by removing tiny Torx screws,and there aren’t any spare ports or bays – the only way to upgrade is to remove components.The Gigabyte’s interior was just as difficult to access,but at least it had spare memory battery 404600 sockets.Connectivity is conventional.On the outside there are three USB 3.0 ports,HDMI and mini-DisplayPort outputs and a single audio jack,and on the inside there’s dual-band 802.11ac Wi-Fi and Gigabit Ethernet.The Gigabyte,once again,proved better – it had five USB connectors and support for Nvidia Surround.The Asus includes a Scrabble-tile keyboard,just like its competitors,and quality is high.The keys are light and we’ve used some that have far more travel,but the slight lack of feedback battery dell xps 11 isn’t a large problem with the firm base – we were quickly able to hammer away for the duration of intensive gaming sessions.The excellent typing encounter matches the MSI and improves on the Gigabyte,but it’s got minor issues.The keys on the numberpad are narrower than those on the rest of the keyboard,and the cursor keys are narrow and not set apart from the rest of the keys,which can make them tricky to hit.There aren’t any dedicated macro keys,either – a feature offered through the Gigabyte.The G550JK’s trackpad is wide and feels smooth and responsive – it’s one of the best units 860066 001 we’ve used.The buttons at the bottom of the pad feel just as good for the most part,although they need to be depressed further in each corner to register clicks.It’s a minor annoyance that you’ll notice if fingers stray during gameplay.

Display

Following the latest trend,Asus does not integrate a viewing angle dependent TN screen,but a considerably superior IPS model.1920×1080 pixels are standard while in the 15-inch category,and enable using multiple,simultaneously opened windows.Compared with the LG Philips LP156WF-4-SPB1 screen in Schenker’s M504,the Samsung 156HL01-02 is somewhat brighter but also has a slightly lower contrast,however 763:1 rather than 930:1 is nonetheless good.Although the illumination specified on paper is not overwhelming,the screen looks homogeneous.We did not ascertain screen charger inspiron 15 7573 bleeding in our review sample.Like in the G750JM and G750JZ,Asus installs its own shade profile that is appealing in the CalMAN test.In addition on the grayscale,both the colour saturation and colour accuracy are higher than in Schenker’s M504 or Gigabyte P35W v2,which also sports an LG Philips LP156WF4.Another advantage of Samsung’s 156HL01-02 becomes evident inside the color room.The differences are not extreme subjectively; both screens provide a multimedia-suitable image.The biggest plus point of the IPS technology is its high viewing angle stability.Unlike TN screens,no major deviations dell xps 15 charger occur vertically.The image only distorts in side views from above or below.The 15-inch laptop also does a good job outdoors.The combination of high brightness and matte finish guarantee carefree outdoor use; only direct sunlight causes visibility problems.

Performance

The lower price of this machine means it’s not able to match the MSI or Gigabyte systems for gaming performance.Instead of toting a GTX 870M core or a rapid-fire SLI arrangement,the Asus relies on a mid-range Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M chipset that’s got fewer than half as many stream processors toshiba a000170200 battery as its rivals.One saving grace is a little bit of overclocking: Asus has tweaked the core clock from 936MHz to 991MHz.The Asus procedure dell 09rn2c charger can’t play several of our test video games at their highest graphics levels.In Bioshock Infinite the G550JK averaged a playable 30fps,but in Battlefield 4 and Crysis 3 those scores slipped to 19fps and 18fps.We only hit playable framerates by toning down the settings.Battlefield 4’s average of 28fps at High settings is almost playable,but we had to dial back to Medium to hit a smooth 51fps.In Crysis 3,we also had to use Medium settings – but right here the average only improved to 32fps. It’s a world apart from the MSI and Gigabyte systems,both of which handled our test titles with no compromises dell dpj89 charger on quality.Theoretical tests highlight the performance gulf.In 3D Mark’s Ice Storm test the G550JK’s score of 100,482 was 9,000 points behind the MSI and 30,000 points short of the Gigabyte,and the Asus then scored 2,863 inside the high-end Fire Strike benchmark – half as much as its rivals.The Asus has a 2.4GHz Core i7-4700HQ processor.It’s similar hardware on the chips inside the G550JK’s rivals,and the Asus scored an excellent 12,312 points in Geekbench.That result lies between the slower MSI and faster Gigabyte,and it indicates that this system has enough power to handle all kinds of demanding software.A generous 16GB of RAM helps the processor along.Both of the G550JK’s rivals have SSDs in RAID arrangements,and both are faster.The Asus’ boot time of 27s didn’t impress,either; SSD-based machines load twice as fast.There’s only room for a four-cell battery charger m9689b a in this program,and that means poor battery life.In our standard test,the Asus lasted for just over three hours – only a few minutes a lot more than the MSI managed,and around half an hour more than the Gigabyte.

That inauspicious result was followed up by an hour-long lifespan in our high-end gaming test,which tends to make complete use of the graphics card.That’s the same lifespan as the MSI,and a little less than the Gigabyte.You’ll need to plug in.Don’t expect much gaming after a thirty-minute emergency charge,either.Hardly any manufacturer puts so much effort lenovo yoga 370 charger from the sound procedure as Asus does.The GL550JK has four speakers that are,however,located during the laptop’s front area.We would call the sound good despite the doubtful positioning even though.Even without the external subwoofer,which needs a bit of getting used to within the beginning and could have used somewhat far more accuracy,the bass outclasses most contenders.The high greatest volume is also impressive.Music,games,and videos can be turned up pleasantly.However,the GL550JK’s sound system is not truly exciting.The laptop would need a lot more capacity for bigger speakers for that.Nevertheless,the sound quality is sufficient for on the go without headphones.Besides Gigabyte’s P34G v2 and P35W v2,both Schenker’s M504 and XMG A504 have a poorer sound.The Asus trades blows with the competition when it comes to slim,light design,and the more modest components inside this procedure helped it perform well in thermal tests too.Those figures are high,but both rival systems recorded higher levels in some tests – and the Asus improved on the competition by staying neat on the outside.We’d use this machine on our laps without fear of burns.The G550JK kept the noise down.While there’s a low rumble when this machine runs intensive games,it’s not as loud as the noise churned out through the MSI and Gigabyte notebooks.

Conclusion

While it’s a system designed for gamers and enthusiasts,the G550JK should appeal to just about any one who wants a highly effective notebook,thanks mainly to a design that’s classy and functional,and also quite light considering all the built-in features.We love the feel of the keyboard and the red ambience of its backlight,the screen is of high quality,and,of course,there is a lot of power inside for playing many of the latest games,or for being productive.The SSD offering is a paltry one,though,with 256GB being the highest that we saw on the supplied spec sheet,and we feel that larger capacities should be options,especially since the unit isn’t all that easy to get into and upgrade yourself .Users who do not mind the somewhat inflexible touchpad,and do not need prolonged battery runtimes can certainly take a closer look at Asus’ GL550JK.Although Nvidia’s GPU suffers greatly under the DDR3 VRAM,Asus has done a more than decent job.We would mention the stylish and pleasantly slim casing right here.2.3 kilograms samsung s27a550h charger points extra to an office laptop and not a gaming machine.The numerous ultrabook elements are also unusual from a gamer’s point of view.Until now,there were few 15-inch laptops that fit in this line.The GL550JK outperforms the IPS contender Schenker M504 in most tests.In addition on the keyboard backlight,the good sound is also a purchase argument.That and the high-contrast screen create a great multimedia backdrop.The restrained fan compensates for the relatively high temperatures,and the GL550JK does not turn into a noisy troublemaker even under high load.Whether a surcharge of 300 Euros in contrast towards the cheaper model is justified,is a thing everyone will have to decide for themselves.In any case,Windows routine is much far more fun with a solid-state drive.The competition will have a hard time should Asus install a better battery and GDDR5 VRAM inside the successor.

 

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *